2.99 See Answer

Question: The information below relates to the audit

The information below relates to the audit of EyeMax Corporation, a client with a calendar year-end. EyeMax has debt agreements associated with publicly traded bonds that require audited financial statements. The company is currently, and historically has been, in compliance with the covenants in the debt agreements. Further, management believes that having audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP is important to shareholders and is “simply a good business practice.” Assume that audit fieldwork has been completed. At this point you are considering several items that have been posted to a “Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.” The Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is a listing auditors compile during an audit as they uncover potential or proposed corrections to the client’s financial statements. Additional detailed information about the items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is provided on the following pages. Based on the information provided, you will be asked to decide the minimum adjustment (if any) to the financial statements that would be necessary before issuing a “clean opinion.” Make sure you carefully consider materiality as you evaluate the misstatements because auditors do not require their clients to book immaterial adjustments.While it is considered best practice to correct errors discovered during the audit, there are situations where it is justifiable to make the corrections in the following period. Therefore, even if, for example, a client has followed a non-GAAP procedure, no adjustment would necessarily be required unless the impact is material (i.e., an individual adjustment(s) is greater than individual account tolerable misstatement or the aggregated sum of all misstatements is greater than overall materiality after considering relevant qualitative factors). At the end of this case you will also be asked several questions related to your decisions. Please carefully consider the following information before you answer the questions. BACKGROUND Nature of client’s business. EyeMax is engaged in research and development, manufacture, and sale of medical devices used by ophthalmologists during eye surgeries. Customers of the product lines are primarily doctors of ophthalmology and laser-eye clinics.Wayne Carruth, MD, founded the company in 1990 to produce and market a line of devices he designed for use in optic surgery. Several years ago, EyeMax began to exploit the future prospects of laser technology in optic surgery. EyeMax has grown rapidly, especially in recent years, and has made significant strides in market share. EyeMax is currently the third largest supplier of optical equipment, with a 25 percent market share, and employs 425 people, up from only 285 employees just two years ago. Thirty percent of the stock in EyeMax is owned by Wayne Carruth and his immediate family. An additional 40 percent of the stock is owned by company employees, with the largest individual holding equal to about ten percent of the company’s shares.Venture capitalists and a few outside investors hold the remaining shares.The company’s shares currently trade on the over-the-counter bulletin-board market.1 Accounting environment, risk assessments, and audit approach. The accounting department employs eight people with various backgrounds: the controller is a CPA, the accounting supervisor and payroll supervisor each have college degrees in business, and the remaining five clerks have limited training and experience. Although the company has no material weaknesses in internal controls, the accounting department has not kept pace with the demands created by growth in production and sales. The department is overworked. Key controls appear to be functioning but are not always performed on a timely basis. In the planning phase of the audit, both inherent risk and control risk were assessed at less than the maximum, but the audit plan specifies an audit approach that relies primarily on substantive testing. Management’s position regarding audit adjustments. EyeMax has been an audit client for five years. Prior audits have generally detected accounting misstatements, and EyeMax’s management has readily made the recommended adjustments. As the client has booked all identified prior-year differences, there are no “turn-around” effects to be considered from the prior year. However, in the past, audit reports have been dated before the end of February.This year, because of deadlines imposed by other clients and staffing problems at your audit firm, fieldwork at EyeMax was not completed by the end of February. Nonetheless, the president of EyeMax, without prior consultation with your firm, provided shareholders and creditors with preliminary earnings information in the last week of February. It is now the middle of March, and the president strongly prefers to minimize adjustments to the financial statements because he believes that such adjustments will unduly reduce shareholder and creditor confidence. In his opinion, no adjustment should be made unless it is absolutely essential for fair presentation.The managing partner of your office has been notified of the situation and the client’s request. She has not yet reviewed the supporting detail presented below, but at this point she agrees that the audit team should not require adjustments be made unless the firm has no choice based on firm audit-practice standards. Materiality. For purposes of planning and conducting the audit, total overall financial statement materiality was set at $625,000.This amount is equal to approximately 5% of earnings before taxes. (Note that because materiality is stated on a before-tax basis, all of the information below is also presented on a before-tax basis.) Performance materiality is an amount less than overall materiality that auditors use to determine the nature, timing and extent of testing. Performance materiality for Eyemax is set to 75% of overall materiality. According to firm policy, tolerable misstatement for any one financial statement account cannot exceed performance materiality. MISSTATEMENTS POSTED TO THE SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS Four proposed adjustments are posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements. These differences are related to warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, litigation expense, and accounts receivable. All items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements have been discussed with the client and the client agrees with our (the auditors’) position on each item. However, for the reasons discussed above, the client would prefer not to book any of the items in the fiscal year under audit. The first three adjustments have been calculated/estimated based on nonsampling procedures. Information about the last difference is based on audit sampling. A sample was selected from accounts receivables. The sample size was determined based on the tolerable misstatement for the account, the expected misstatement in the population tested, and the acceptable level of risk. Warranty expense. Warranty expense in the current year is estimated to be understated by $130,000 based on the following information: EyeMax grants a written one-year warranty for all products and estimates warranty expense based on current-year sales. However, during the last two years, the company has been making verbal commitments to repair or replace all products for a two-year period. The company has been complying with its verbal commitments and intends to continue the practice to improve customer relations. Because of this change in warranty policy, analysis of warranty repair and replacement data supports a $130,000 addition to the warranty expense estimate for the current year. Repair and maintenance expense. Repair expense in the current year is understated by $200,000.The client inappropriately capitalized $240,000 of cost related to modifications to its production process. Because the modifications were unsuccessful, the full amount should be written off in the current year. The client has included one-sixth of the capitalized amount in depreciation expense for the year; therefore, net of the amount included in depreciation expense for the current year, overall expense in the current year is understated by $200,000. Litigation expense. Product liability expense is overstated by $50,000. The client maintains product liability insurance with a $50,000 per occurrence deductible.The client has an excellent record relating to product liability. One liability case was pending at year-end and the client had conservatively accrued $50,000 at year-end to provide for the potential loss even though the likelihood of loss was remote. A judge ruled the case was without merit shortly after year-end. Accounts Receivable. The major audit work in the accounts receivable area was confirmation of customer balances. At year-end, EyeMax had receivables from 1,545 customers with a book value of approximately $12,600,000. Based on preliminary estimates, a random sample of 40 accounts was selected for positive confirmation. Customer- reported differences and alternative audit procedures applied to nonreplies revealed misstatements in four accounts that are detailed in Exhibit 1. The misstatements all appeared to be unintentional (e.g., using an incorrect price in billing). The net effect of the misstatements is an overstatement of Accounts Receivable (and Sales) at year-end.
The information below relates to the audit of EyeMax Corporation, a client with a calendar year-end. EyeMax has debt agreements associated with publicly traded bonds that require audited financial statements. The company is currently, and historically has been, in compliance with the covenants in the debt agreements. Further, management believes that having audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP is important to shareholders and is “simply a good business practice.”
Assume that audit fieldwork has been completed. At this point you are considering several items that have been posted to a “Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.” The Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is a listing auditors compile during an audit as they uncover potential or proposed corrections to the client’s financial statements. Additional detailed information about the items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is provided on the following pages. Based on the information provided, you will be asked to decide the minimum adjustment (if any) to the financial statements that would be necessary before issuing a “clean opinion.”
Make sure you carefully consider materiality as you evaluate the misstatements because auditors do not require their clients to book immaterial adjustments.While it is considered best practice to correct errors discovered during the audit, there are situations where it is justifiable to make the corrections in the following period. Therefore, even if, for example, a client has followed a non-GAAP procedure, no adjustment would necessarily be required unless the impact is material (i.e., an individual adjustment(s) is greater than individual account tolerable misstatement or the aggregated sum of all misstatements is greater than overall materiality after considering relevant qualitative factors). At the end of this case you will also be asked several questions related to your decisions. Please carefully consider the following information before you answer the questions.
BACKGROUND
Nature of client’s business.
EyeMax is engaged in research and development, manufacture, and sale of medical devices used by ophthalmologists during eye surgeries. Customers of the product lines are primarily doctors of ophthalmology and laser-eye clinics.Wayne Carruth, MD, founded the company in 1990 to produce and market a line of devices he designed for use in optic surgery. Several years ago, EyeMax began to exploit the future prospects of laser technology in optic surgery. EyeMax has grown rapidly, especially in recent years, and has made significant strides in market share. EyeMax is currently the third largest supplier of optical equipment, with a 25 percent market share, and employs 425 people, up from only 285 employees just two years ago. Thirty percent of the stock in EyeMax is owned by Wayne Carruth and his immediate family. An additional 40 percent of the stock is owned by company employees, with the largest individual holding equal to about ten percent of the company’s shares.Venture capitalists and a few outside investors hold the remaining shares.The company’s shares currently trade on the over-the-counter bulletin-board market.1
Accounting environment, risk assessments, and audit approach.
The accounting department employs eight people with various backgrounds: the controller is a CPA, the accounting supervisor and payroll supervisor each have college degrees in business, and the remaining five clerks have limited training and experience. Although the company has no material weaknesses in internal controls, the accounting department has not kept pace with the demands created by growth in production and sales. The department is overworked. Key controls appear to be functioning but are not always performed on a timely basis. In the planning phase of the audit, both inherent risk and control risk were assessed at less than the maximum, but the audit plan specifies an audit approach that relies primarily on substantive testing.
Management’s position regarding audit adjustments.
EyeMax has been an audit client for five years. Prior audits have generally detected accounting misstatements, and EyeMax’s management has readily made the recommended adjustments. As the client has booked all identified prior-year differences, there are no “turn-around” effects to be considered from the prior year. However, in the past, audit reports have been dated before the end of February.This year, because of deadlines imposed by other clients and staffing problems at your audit firm, fieldwork at EyeMax was not completed by the end of February. Nonetheless, the president of EyeMax, without prior consultation with your firm, provided shareholders and creditors with preliminary earnings information in the last week of February. It is now the middle of March, and the president strongly prefers to minimize adjustments to the financial statements because he believes that such adjustments will unduly reduce shareholder and creditor confidence. In his opinion, no adjustment should be made unless it is absolutely essential for fair presentation.The managing partner of your office has been notified of the situation and the client’s request. She has not yet reviewed the supporting detail presented below, but at this point she agrees that the audit team should not require adjustments be made unless the firm has no choice based on firm audit-practice standards.
Materiality.
For purposes of planning and conducting the audit, total overall financial statement materiality was set at
$625,000.This amount is equal to approximately 5% of earnings before taxes. (Note that because materiality is stated on a before-tax basis, all of the information below is also presented on a before-tax basis.) Performance materiality is an amount less than overall materiality that auditors use to determine the nature, timing and extent of testing. Performance materiality for Eyemax is set to 75% of overall materiality. According to firm policy, tolerable misstatement for any one financial statement account cannot exceed performance materiality.
MISSTATEMENTS POSTED TO THE SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS
Four proposed adjustments are posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements. These differences are related to warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, litigation expense, and accounts receivable. All items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements have been discussed with the client and the client agrees with our (the auditors’) position on each item. However, for the reasons discussed above, the client would prefer not to book any of the items in the fiscal year under audit. The first three adjustments have been calculated/estimated based on nonsampling procedures. Information about the last difference is based on audit sampling. A sample was selected from accounts receivables. The sample size was determined based on the tolerable misstatement for the account, the expected misstatement in the population tested, and the acceptable level of risk.
Warranty expense.
Warranty expense in the current year is estimated to be understated by $130,000 based on the following information: EyeMax grants a written one-year warranty for all products and estimates warranty expense based on current-year sales. However, during the last two years, the company has been making verbal commitments to repair or replace all products for a two-year period. The company has been complying with its verbal commitments and intends to continue the practice to improve customer relations. Because of this change in warranty policy, analysis of warranty repair and replacement data supports a $130,000 addition to the warranty expense estimate for the current year.
Repair and maintenance expense.
Repair expense in the current year is understated by $200,000.The client inappropriately capitalized $240,000 of cost related to modifications to its production process. Because the modifications were unsuccessful, the full amount should be written off in the current year. The client has included one-sixth of the capitalized amount in depreciation expense for the year; therefore, net of the amount included in depreciation expense for the current year, overall expense in the current year is understated by $200,000.
Litigation expense.
Product liability expense is overstated by $50,000. The client maintains product liability insurance with a
$50,000 per occurrence deductible.The client has an excellent record relating to product liability. One liability case was pending at year-end and the client had conservatively accrued $50,000 at year-end to provide for the potential loss even though the likelihood of loss was remote. A judge ruled the case was without merit shortly after year-end.
Accounts Receivable.
The major audit work in the accounts receivable area was confirmation of customer balances. At year-end, EyeMax had receivables from 1,545 customers with a book value of approximately $12,600,000. Based on preliminary estimates, a random sample of 40 accounts was selected for positive confirmation. Customer- reported differences and alternative audit procedures applied to nonreplies revealed misstatements in four accounts that are detailed in Exhibit 1. The misstatements all appeared to be unintentional (e.g., using an incorrect price in billing). The net effect of the misstatements is an overstatement of Accounts Receivable (and Sales) at year-end.
SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS
The following items have been recorded on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements:
Required 
[1] [Which of the following three alternatives best describes the conditions under which you would issue a clean opinion for EyeMax? (select one)
 ______ a.	I would not be willing to issue a clean opinion even if EyeMax is willing to make adjustments for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.
_______b.	I would be willing to issue a clean opinion without any adjustments.
_______c. I would be willing to issue a clean opinion only if EyeMax is willing to make some adjustments to their financial statements for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.
Briefly explain your choice:
[2] If you selected options “a” or “b” in question 1, assume now that the client has decided that they will make an adjustment of up to $250,000 to their financial statements. Please decompose the total adjustment you would recommend into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to no more than $250,000).

If you selected item “c” in question 1, what is the minimum total adjustment that you would require before issuing a clean opinion? $_____________. Please decompose this total adjustment into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment, if any, would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to your required minimum adjustment).
Please briefly explain your decisions:

SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS The following items have been recorded on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements:
The information below relates to the audit of EyeMax Corporation, a client with a calendar year-end. EyeMax has debt agreements associated with publicly traded bonds that require audited financial statements. The company is currently, and historically has been, in compliance with the covenants in the debt agreements. Further, management believes that having audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP is important to shareholders and is “simply a good business practice.”
Assume that audit fieldwork has been completed. At this point you are considering several items that have been posted to a “Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.” The Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is a listing auditors compile during an audit as they uncover potential or proposed corrections to the client’s financial statements. Additional detailed information about the items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is provided on the following pages. Based on the information provided, you will be asked to decide the minimum adjustment (if any) to the financial statements that would be necessary before issuing a “clean opinion.”
Make sure you carefully consider materiality as you evaluate the misstatements because auditors do not require their clients to book immaterial adjustments.While it is considered best practice to correct errors discovered during the audit, there are situations where it is justifiable to make the corrections in the following period. Therefore, even if, for example, a client has followed a non-GAAP procedure, no adjustment would necessarily be required unless the impact is material (i.e., an individual adjustment(s) is greater than individual account tolerable misstatement or the aggregated sum of all misstatements is greater than overall materiality after considering relevant qualitative factors). At the end of this case you will also be asked several questions related to your decisions. Please carefully consider the following information before you answer the questions.
BACKGROUND
Nature of client’s business.
EyeMax is engaged in research and development, manufacture, and sale of medical devices used by ophthalmologists during eye surgeries. Customers of the product lines are primarily doctors of ophthalmology and laser-eye clinics.Wayne Carruth, MD, founded the company in 1990 to produce and market a line of devices he designed for use in optic surgery. Several years ago, EyeMax began to exploit the future prospects of laser technology in optic surgery. EyeMax has grown rapidly, especially in recent years, and has made significant strides in market share. EyeMax is currently the third largest supplier of optical equipment, with a 25 percent market share, and employs 425 people, up from only 285 employees just two years ago. Thirty percent of the stock in EyeMax is owned by Wayne Carruth and his immediate family. An additional 40 percent of the stock is owned by company employees, with the largest individual holding equal to about ten percent of the company’s shares.Venture capitalists and a few outside investors hold the remaining shares.The company’s shares currently trade on the over-the-counter bulletin-board market.1
Accounting environment, risk assessments, and audit approach.
The accounting department employs eight people with various backgrounds: the controller is a CPA, the accounting supervisor and payroll supervisor each have college degrees in business, and the remaining five clerks have limited training and experience. Although the company has no material weaknesses in internal controls, the accounting department has not kept pace with the demands created by growth in production and sales. The department is overworked. Key controls appear to be functioning but are not always performed on a timely basis. In the planning phase of the audit, both inherent risk and control risk were assessed at less than the maximum, but the audit plan specifies an audit approach that relies primarily on substantive testing.
Management’s position regarding audit adjustments.
EyeMax has been an audit client for five years. Prior audits have generally detected accounting misstatements, and EyeMax’s management has readily made the recommended adjustments. As the client has booked all identified prior-year differences, there are no “turn-around” effects to be considered from the prior year. However, in the past, audit reports have been dated before the end of February.This year, because of deadlines imposed by other clients and staffing problems at your audit firm, fieldwork at EyeMax was not completed by the end of February. Nonetheless, the president of EyeMax, without prior consultation with your firm, provided shareholders and creditors with preliminary earnings information in the last week of February. It is now the middle of March, and the president strongly prefers to minimize adjustments to the financial statements because he believes that such adjustments will unduly reduce shareholder and creditor confidence. In his opinion, no adjustment should be made unless it is absolutely essential for fair presentation.The managing partner of your office has been notified of the situation and the client’s request. She has not yet reviewed the supporting detail presented below, but at this point she agrees that the audit team should not require adjustments be made unless the firm has no choice based on firm audit-practice standards.
Materiality.
For purposes of planning and conducting the audit, total overall financial statement materiality was set at
$625,000.This amount is equal to approximately 5% of earnings before taxes. (Note that because materiality is stated on a before-tax basis, all of the information below is also presented on a before-tax basis.) Performance materiality is an amount less than overall materiality that auditors use to determine the nature, timing and extent of testing. Performance materiality for Eyemax is set to 75% of overall materiality. According to firm policy, tolerable misstatement for any one financial statement account cannot exceed performance materiality.
MISSTATEMENTS POSTED TO THE SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS
Four proposed adjustments are posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements. These differences are related to warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, litigation expense, and accounts receivable. All items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements have been discussed with the client and the client agrees with our (the auditors’) position on each item. However, for the reasons discussed above, the client would prefer not to book any of the items in the fiscal year under audit. The first three adjustments have been calculated/estimated based on nonsampling procedures. Information about the last difference is based on audit sampling. A sample was selected from accounts receivables. The sample size was determined based on the tolerable misstatement for the account, the expected misstatement in the population tested, and the acceptable level of risk.
Warranty expense.
Warranty expense in the current year is estimated to be understated by $130,000 based on the following information: EyeMax grants a written one-year warranty for all products and estimates warranty expense based on current-year sales. However, during the last two years, the company has been making verbal commitments to repair or replace all products for a two-year period. The company has been complying with its verbal commitments and intends to continue the practice to improve customer relations. Because of this change in warranty policy, analysis of warranty repair and replacement data supports a $130,000 addition to the warranty expense estimate for the current year.
Repair and maintenance expense.
Repair expense in the current year is understated by $200,000.The client inappropriately capitalized $240,000 of cost related to modifications to its production process. Because the modifications were unsuccessful, the full amount should be written off in the current year. The client has included one-sixth of the capitalized amount in depreciation expense for the year; therefore, net of the amount included in depreciation expense for the current year, overall expense in the current year is understated by $200,000.
Litigation expense.
Product liability expense is overstated by $50,000. The client maintains product liability insurance with a
$50,000 per occurrence deductible.The client has an excellent record relating to product liability. One liability case was pending at year-end and the client had conservatively accrued $50,000 at year-end to provide for the potential loss even though the likelihood of loss was remote. A judge ruled the case was without merit shortly after year-end.
Accounts Receivable.
The major audit work in the accounts receivable area was confirmation of customer balances. At year-end, EyeMax had receivables from 1,545 customers with a book value of approximately $12,600,000. Based on preliminary estimates, a random sample of 40 accounts was selected for positive confirmation. Customer- reported differences and alternative audit procedures applied to nonreplies revealed misstatements in four accounts that are detailed in Exhibit 1. The misstatements all appeared to be unintentional (e.g., using an incorrect price in billing). The net effect of the misstatements is an overstatement of Accounts Receivable (and Sales) at year-end.
SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS
The following items have been recorded on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements:
Required 
[1] [Which of the following three alternatives best describes the conditions under which you would issue a clean opinion for EyeMax? (select one)
 ______ a.	I would not be willing to issue a clean opinion even if EyeMax is willing to make adjustments for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.
_______b.	I would be willing to issue a clean opinion without any adjustments.
_______c. I would be willing to issue a clean opinion only if EyeMax is willing to make some adjustments to their financial statements for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.
Briefly explain your choice:
[2] If you selected options “a” or “b” in question 1, assume now that the client has decided that they will make an adjustment of up to $250,000 to their financial statements. Please decompose the total adjustment you would recommend into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to no more than $250,000).

If you selected item “c” in question 1, what is the minimum total adjustment that you would require before issuing a clean opinion? $_____________. Please decompose this total adjustment into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment, if any, would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to your required minimum adjustment).
Please briefly explain your decisions:

Required [1] [Which of the following three alternatives best describes the conditions under which you would issue a clean opinion for EyeMax? (select one) ______ a. I would not be willing to issue a clean opinion even if EyeMax is willing to make adjustments for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements. _______b. I would be willing to issue a clean opinion without any adjustments. _______c. I would be willing to issue a clean opinion only if EyeMax is willing to make some adjustments to their financial statements for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements. Briefly explain your choice: [2] If you selected options “a” or “b” in question 1, assume now that the client has decided that they will make an adjustment of up to $250,000 to their financial statements. Please decompose the total adjustment you would recommend into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to no more than $250,000). If you selected item “c” in question 1, what is the minimum total adjustment that you would require before issuing a clean opinion? $_____________. Please decompose this total adjustment into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment, if any, would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to your required minimum adjustment).
The information below relates to the audit of EyeMax Corporation, a client with a calendar year-end. EyeMax has debt agreements associated with publicly traded bonds that require audited financial statements. The company is currently, and historically has been, in compliance with the covenants in the debt agreements. Further, management believes that having audited financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP is important to shareholders and is “simply a good business practice.”
Assume that audit fieldwork has been completed. At this point you are considering several items that have been posted to a “Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.” The Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is a listing auditors compile during an audit as they uncover potential or proposed corrections to the client’s financial statements. Additional detailed information about the items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements is provided on the following pages. Based on the information provided, you will be asked to decide the minimum adjustment (if any) to the financial statements that would be necessary before issuing a “clean opinion.”
Make sure you carefully consider materiality as you evaluate the misstatements because auditors do not require their clients to book immaterial adjustments.While it is considered best practice to correct errors discovered during the audit, there are situations where it is justifiable to make the corrections in the following period. Therefore, even if, for example, a client has followed a non-GAAP procedure, no adjustment would necessarily be required unless the impact is material (i.e., an individual adjustment(s) is greater than individual account tolerable misstatement or the aggregated sum of all misstatements is greater than overall materiality after considering relevant qualitative factors). At the end of this case you will also be asked several questions related to your decisions. Please carefully consider the following information before you answer the questions.
BACKGROUND
Nature of client’s business.
EyeMax is engaged in research and development, manufacture, and sale of medical devices used by ophthalmologists during eye surgeries. Customers of the product lines are primarily doctors of ophthalmology and laser-eye clinics.Wayne Carruth, MD, founded the company in 1990 to produce and market a line of devices he designed for use in optic surgery. Several years ago, EyeMax began to exploit the future prospects of laser technology in optic surgery. EyeMax has grown rapidly, especially in recent years, and has made significant strides in market share. EyeMax is currently the third largest supplier of optical equipment, with a 25 percent market share, and employs 425 people, up from only 285 employees just two years ago. Thirty percent of the stock in EyeMax is owned by Wayne Carruth and his immediate family. An additional 40 percent of the stock is owned by company employees, with the largest individual holding equal to about ten percent of the company’s shares.Venture capitalists and a few outside investors hold the remaining shares.The company’s shares currently trade on the over-the-counter bulletin-board market.1
Accounting environment, risk assessments, and audit approach.
The accounting department employs eight people with various backgrounds: the controller is a CPA, the accounting supervisor and payroll supervisor each have college degrees in business, and the remaining five clerks have limited training and experience. Although the company has no material weaknesses in internal controls, the accounting department has not kept pace with the demands created by growth in production and sales. The department is overworked. Key controls appear to be functioning but are not always performed on a timely basis. In the planning phase of the audit, both inherent risk and control risk were assessed at less than the maximum, but the audit plan specifies an audit approach that relies primarily on substantive testing.
Management’s position regarding audit adjustments.
EyeMax has been an audit client for five years. Prior audits have generally detected accounting misstatements, and EyeMax’s management has readily made the recommended adjustments. As the client has booked all identified prior-year differences, there are no “turn-around” effects to be considered from the prior year. However, in the past, audit reports have been dated before the end of February.This year, because of deadlines imposed by other clients and staffing problems at your audit firm, fieldwork at EyeMax was not completed by the end of February. Nonetheless, the president of EyeMax, without prior consultation with your firm, provided shareholders and creditors with preliminary earnings information in the last week of February. It is now the middle of March, and the president strongly prefers to minimize adjustments to the financial statements because he believes that such adjustments will unduly reduce shareholder and creditor confidence. In his opinion, no adjustment should be made unless it is absolutely essential for fair presentation.The managing partner of your office has been notified of the situation and the client’s request. She has not yet reviewed the supporting detail presented below, but at this point she agrees that the audit team should not require adjustments be made unless the firm has no choice based on firm audit-practice standards.
Materiality.
For purposes of planning and conducting the audit, total overall financial statement materiality was set at
$625,000.This amount is equal to approximately 5% of earnings before taxes. (Note that because materiality is stated on a before-tax basis, all of the information below is also presented on a before-tax basis.) Performance materiality is an amount less than overall materiality that auditors use to determine the nature, timing and extent of testing. Performance materiality for Eyemax is set to 75% of overall materiality. According to firm policy, tolerable misstatement for any one financial statement account cannot exceed performance materiality.
MISSTATEMENTS POSTED TO THE SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS
Four proposed adjustments are posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements. These differences are related to warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, litigation expense, and accounts receivable. All items posted to the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements have been discussed with the client and the client agrees with our (the auditors’) position on each item. However, for the reasons discussed above, the client would prefer not to book any of the items in the fiscal year under audit. The first three adjustments have been calculated/estimated based on nonsampling procedures. Information about the last difference is based on audit sampling. A sample was selected from accounts receivables. The sample size was determined based on the tolerable misstatement for the account, the expected misstatement in the population tested, and the acceptable level of risk.
Warranty expense.
Warranty expense in the current year is estimated to be understated by $130,000 based on the following information: EyeMax grants a written one-year warranty for all products and estimates warranty expense based on current-year sales. However, during the last two years, the company has been making verbal commitments to repair or replace all products for a two-year period. The company has been complying with its verbal commitments and intends to continue the practice to improve customer relations. Because of this change in warranty policy, analysis of warranty repair and replacement data supports a $130,000 addition to the warranty expense estimate for the current year.
Repair and maintenance expense.
Repair expense in the current year is understated by $200,000.The client inappropriately capitalized $240,000 of cost related to modifications to its production process. Because the modifications were unsuccessful, the full amount should be written off in the current year. The client has included one-sixth of the capitalized amount in depreciation expense for the year; therefore, net of the amount included in depreciation expense for the current year, overall expense in the current year is understated by $200,000.
Litigation expense.
Product liability expense is overstated by $50,000. The client maintains product liability insurance with a
$50,000 per occurrence deductible.The client has an excellent record relating to product liability. One liability case was pending at year-end and the client had conservatively accrued $50,000 at year-end to provide for the potential loss even though the likelihood of loss was remote. A judge ruled the case was without merit shortly after year-end.
Accounts Receivable.
The major audit work in the accounts receivable area was confirmation of customer balances. At year-end, EyeMax had receivables from 1,545 customers with a book value of approximately $12,600,000. Based on preliminary estimates, a random sample of 40 accounts was selected for positive confirmation. Customer- reported differences and alternative audit procedures applied to nonreplies revealed misstatements in four accounts that are detailed in Exhibit 1. The misstatements all appeared to be unintentional (e.g., using an incorrect price in billing). The net effect of the misstatements is an overstatement of Accounts Receivable (and Sales) at year-end.
SUMMARY OF UNADJUSTED MISSTATEMENTS
The following items have been recorded on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements:
Required 
[1] [Which of the following three alternatives best describes the conditions under which you would issue a clean opinion for EyeMax? (select one)
 ______ a.	I would not be willing to issue a clean opinion even if EyeMax is willing to make adjustments for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.
_______b.	I would be willing to issue a clean opinion without any adjustments.
_______c. I would be willing to issue a clean opinion only if EyeMax is willing to make some adjustments to their financial statements for items on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements.
Briefly explain your choice:
[2] If you selected options “a” or “b” in question 1, assume now that the client has decided that they will make an adjustment of up to $250,000 to their financial statements. Please decompose the total adjustment you would recommend into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to no more than $250,000).

If you selected item “c” in question 1, what is the minimum total adjustment that you would require before issuing a clean opinion? $_____________. Please decompose this total adjustment into the individual account classifications included on the Summary of Unadjusted Misstatements in the space provided below (e.g., what adjustment, if any, would you require for warranty expense, repair and maintenance expense, etc? The dollar values of your individual account adjustments should sum to your required minimum adjustment).
Please briefly explain your decisions:

Please briefly explain your decisions:


> An ongoing study of wolves is being conducted at the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve. Table in the Data Bank gives the physical characteristics of wolves that were captured. (a) Plot length versus weight for the male wolves. From your visual inspe

> A zoologist collected 20 wild lizards in the southwestern United States. After measuring their total length (mm), they were placed on a treadmill and their speed (m/sec) recorded. (a) Create a scatter plot. Comment on any unusual observations. (b) Calcu

> The Department of Natural Resources in Wisconsin monitors air quality in the state. Ozone is a major component of smog and high temperatures also contribute. The summer maximum daily ozone (ppm) and temperature for 23 Wednesdays during two summers are Ca

> Over the years, a traffic officer noticed that cars with fuzzy dice hanging on the rear-view mirror always seemed to be speeding. Perhaps tongue in cheek, he suggest ed that outlawing the sale of fuzzy dice would reduce the number of cars exceeding the

> What is wrong with this statement of purpose? PURPOSE: Determine if a new style wireless mouse is comfortable. Give an improved statement of purpose.

> Calculations from a data set of n = 36 pairs of ( x, y) values have provided the following results. Obtain the correlation coefficient.

> Is the correlation in Figure 9 about (a) .1, (b) .5, (c) .9, or (d) -.7?

> Match the following values of r with the correct diagrams. (a) r - .3 (b) r .l (c) r .9

> (a) Construct scatter diagrams of the data sets (b) Calculate r for the data set (i). (c) Guess the value of r for the data set (ii) and then calculate r.

> Breakfast cereals from three leading manufacturers can be classified either above average or below average in sugar content. Data for ten cereals from each manufacturer are given below: (a) Complete the marginal totals. (b) Calculate the relative freque

> Refer to the alligator data of the Data Bank. Using the data on x3 and x4 for male and female alligators from Lake Apopka: (a) Make a scatter diagram of the pairs of concentrations for the male alligators. Calculate the sample correlation coefficient.

> For the data set (a) Construct a scatter diagram. (b) Guess the sign and value of the correlation coefficient. (c) Calculate the correlation coefficient.

> If the value of r is small, can we conclude that there is not a strong relationship between the two variables?

> A new study is widely reported to show that dog owners benefit by being more agreeable and extroverted than cat owners. Comment in light of facts that, on average, dogs cost more to maintain and that dog owners have larger incomes than cat owners.

> In each of the following instances, would you expect a positive, negative, or zero correlation? (a) Number of salespersons and total dollar sales for real estate firms. (b) Total payroll and percent of wins of national league baseball teams. (c) The amou

> What is wrong with this statement of purpose? PURPOSE: Determine whether or not, over the course of the semester, the campus bus reaches your stop at the scheduled time. Give an improved statement of purpose.

> Would you expect a positive, negative, or nearly zero correlation for each of the following7 Give reasons for your answers. (a) The physical fitness of a dog and the physical fitness of the owner. (b) For each person, the number of songs downloaded fro

> With reference to the quit-smoking experiment: (a) Suppose the placebo trials were ignored and you were only told that 120 of 216 were abstinent after using the medicated patches. Would this now appear to be stronger evidence in favor of the patches? (

> With reference to the quit-smoking experiment, suppose two new subjects are available. Explain how you would assign one subject to receive the placebo and one to receive the medicated patch.

> Nausea from air sickness affects some travelers. A drug company, wanting to establish the effectiveness of its motion sickness pill, randomly gives either its pill or a look-alike sugar pill (placebo) to 200 passengers. (a) Complete the marginal totals.

> A sample of persons will each be asked to give the number of their close friends. The responses are to be grouped into the following classes: 0, 1-3, 3-5, 6 or more. Left endpoint is included. Explain where difficulties might arise.

> The number of goals your favorite ice hockey team scores are to be collected for each game. These game totals are to be grouped into the classes 0- 1, 2- 3, 4- 5, 7 or more. Both endpoints are included. Explain where a difficulty might arise.

> Data from one campus dorm on the number of burglaries are collected each week of the semester. These data are to be grouped into the classes 0-1, 2-3, 3-5, 6 or more. Both endpoints included. Explain where a difficulty might arise.

> Of the $207 million raised by a major university's fund drive, $11 7 million came from individuals and bequests, $24 million from industry and business, and $66 million from foundations and associations. Present this information in the form of a pie char

> At the last minute, 6 tickets have become available for a big football game. Use Table 1, Appendix B, to select the recipients from among 89 interested students.

> Eighty customers at a bakery named their favorite pie. The responses are as follows: (a) Calculate the frequency for each pie. (b) Construct a pie chart.

> The number of automobile accidents reported per month helps to identify intersections that require improvement. The number of crashes per month reported at an intersection near a university campus in Madison, Wisconsin, are Present these data in a freque

> A student at the University of Wisconsin surveyed 40 students in her dorm concerning their participation in extracurricular activities during the past week. The data on number of activities are Present these data in a frequency table and in a relative fr

> Recorded here are the blood types of 40 persons who have volunteered to donate blood at a plasma center. Summarize the data in a frequency table. Include calculations of the relative frequencies.

> The city of Madison regularly checks the water quality at swimming beaches located on area lakes. The concentration of fecal coliforms, in number of colony forming units (CFU) per 100 ml of water, was measured on fifteen days during the summer at one bea

> A campus area merchant recorded the number of bad checks received per month, for five months 4 5 4 7 6 Display the data in a dot diagram.

> Before microwave ovens are sold, the manufacturer must check to ensure that the radiation coming through the door is below a specified safe limit. The amounts of radiation leakage (mW/cm2) with the door closed from 25 ovens are as follows (courtesy of Jo

> A person with asthma took measurements by blowing into a peak-flow meter on seven consecutive days. 429 425 471 422 432 444 454 Display the data in a dot diagram.

> A sample of 50 departing airline passengers at the main check-in counter produced the following number of bags checked through to final destinations. (a) Make a relative frequency line diagram. (b) Comment on the pattern. (c) What proportion of passenger

> A major West Coast power company surveyed 50 customers who were asked to respond to the statement, "People should rely mainly on themselves to solve problems caused by power outages" with one of the following responses. 1. Definitely agree. 2. Somewhat

> Twelve bicycles are available for use at the student union. Use Table 1, to select 4 of them for you and three of your friends to ride today.

> A survey of 451 men revealed that 144 men, or 3 1.9%, wait until Valentine's day or the day before to purchase flowers. Identify a statistical population and the sample.

> It was 9:30 A.M. on a Monday morning when the call came through. “Hi Dr. Mitchell, do you have a minute?” “Sure,” the professor replied. “I am one of your former students, but if you don’t mind, I would prefer to remain anonymous. I think it is best for

> Nathan recently interviewed with one of the accounting firms in the city where he wants to live. The firm agreed to cover the expense of a rental car that he used to travel from his university to the firm’s office. The rental car agency required that Nat

> Brent Dorsey graduated six months ago with a master’s degree in accounting. Immediately after graduation, Brent began working with a large accounting firm in Portland, Oregon. He is now on his second audit engagement—a company called Northwest Steel Prod

> Banking regulators announced in early 2015 a greater focus on evaluating ethical culture as part of their regulatory examination of a bank’s health. In a February 2015 speech, Thomas Baxter, Executive Vice President and General Counsel

> On November 15, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed an enforcement action in the Northern Illinois U.S. District Court against Hollinger Inc., a Toronto-based company, and its former Chairman and CEO, Conrad Black, and the company’s

> Murchison Technologies, Inc. recently developed a patient-billing software system that it markets to physicians and dentists. Jim Archer and Janice Johnson founded the company in Austin, Texas five years ago after working at IBM for more than 15 years. J

> Scott glanced up at the clock on his office wall. It read 2:30 P.M. He had scheduled a 3:00 P.M. meeting with George “Hang-ten” Baldwin, chief executive officer of Surfer Dude Duds, Inc. Surfer Dude specialized in selling clothing and accessories popular

> Spencer and Loveland, LLP is a medium-sized, regional accounting firm based in the western part of the United States. A new client of the firm, K&K, Inc., which manufactures a variety of picture frames, recently contracted with Spencer and Loveland t

> Auto Parts, Inc. (“the Company”) manufactures automobile subassemblies marketed primarily to the large U.S. automakers. The publicly held Company’s unaudited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, reflect total assets of $56 million,

> The Runners Shop (TRS) was a family-owned business founded 17 years ago by Robert and Andrea Johnson. In July of 2018, TRS found itself experiencing a severe cash shortage that forced it to file for bankruptcy protection. Prior to shutting down its opera

> Southeast Shoe Distributor (SSD) is a closely-owned business that was founded 10 years ago by Stewart Green and Paul Williams. SSD is a distributor that purchases and resells men’s, women’s, and childrenâ€&#

> Southeast Shoe Distributor (SSD) is a closely owned business founded 10 years ago by Stewart Green and Paul Williams. SSD is a distributor that purchases and resells men’s, women’s, and children’s sho

> Southeast Shoe Distributor (SSD) is a closely owned business that was founded 10 years ago by Stewart Green and Paul Williams. SSD is a distributor that purchases and sells men’s, women’s, and childrenâ€&#15

> After being in business for only two years, Your 1040 Return.com has quickly become a leading provider of online income tax preparation and filing services for individual taxpayers. Steven Chicago founded the company after a business idea came to him whi

> Southeast Shoe Distributor (SSD) is a closely owned business that was founded 10 years ago by Stewart Green and Paul Williams. SSD is a distributor that purchases and sells men’s, women’s, and childrenâ€&#15

> Southeast Shoe Distributor (SSD) is a closely owned business that was founded ten years ago by Stewart Green and Paul Williams. SSD is a distributor that purchases and sells men’s, women’s, and childrenâ€&#1

> RedPack Beer Company is a privately-held micro brewery located in Raleigh, North Carolina. Bank loan covenants require that RedPack submit audited financial statements annually to the bank. Specifically, the bank covenants contain revenue and liquidity m

> Your audit firm, Garrett and Schulzke LLP, is engaged to perform the annual audit of Hooplah, Inc., for the year ending December 31, 2017. Hooplah is a privately-held company that sells electronics components to companies that manufacture various applian

> The Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, (ASC 820) provides a framework for measuring or estimating the fair value of certain assets and liabilities. It provides a hierarchy with three

> Confirmations of accounts receivable play an important role in the accumulation of sufficient, appropriate audit evidence. One of the principal strengths of confirmations is that they provide evidence obtained directly from third-parties. Auditing Standa

> You couldn’t be more excited about being on your first financial statement audit as you launch into your new professional accounting career. Having recently graduated with a Master of Accountancy degree, you are thrilled to be employing all the skills ac

> Henrico Retail, Inc. is a first year audit client. The audit partner obtained the following description of the sales system after recently meeting with client personnel at the corporate office. DESCRIPTION OF THE SALES SYSTEM Henrico’s sales system is IT

> Wally’s Billboard & Sign Supply, Inc. was founded four years ago by Walter Johnson. The company specializes in providing locations for sign and billboard advertising and has recently begun to enter the sign design market. After working several years in t

> Burlingham Bees, an independent, minor league baseball team, competes in the Northwest Coast League. The team finished in second place in 2018 with a record of 94-50. The Bees’ 2018 cumulative season attendance of 534,784 spectators set

> Asher Farms, Inc. is a fully-integrated poultry processing company engaged in the production, processing, marketing and distribution of fresh and frozen chicken products.Asher Farms sells ice pack, chill pack and frozen chicken, in whole, cut-up and bone

> Northwest Bank (NWB) has banking operations in 35 communities in the states of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. Headquarters for the bank are in Walla Walla, Washington. NWB’s loan portfolio consists primarily of agricultural loans, comme

> Analytical procedures can be powerful tools in conducting an audit. They help the auditor understand a client’s business and are useful in identifying potential risks and problem areas requiring greater substantive audit attention. If f

> Anne Aylor, Inc. (Anne Aylor) is a leading national specialty retailer of high-quality women’s apparel, shoes, and accessories sold primarily under the “Anne Aylor” brand name. Anne Aylor is a highly

> Town and Country Hardware (T&CH) is a closely owned business founded six years ago by Caleb and Jasmine Wright. T&CH has retail hardware stores located at three lake communities along the Virginia and North Carolina border. T&CH sells products for home i

> In a management review control (MRC), members of management review key information and evaluate its reasonableness by comparing it to expected values. Some examples include comparing budget to actual, reviewing impairment analyses, and reviewing estimate

> On January 24, 2008, Société Générale, France’s second largest bank announced the largest trading loss in history, a staggering 4.9 billion Euro ($7.2 billion U.S.), which it blamed on a single rogue trader. The trader, Jérôme Kerviel, worked at what Soc

> Large public companies in the U.S. are required by law to engage an auditor to perform an “integrated audit” involving both a traditional financial statement audit and an audit of internal control over financial reporting. PCAOB Audit Standard No. 2201,

> You are the new information technology (IT) audit specialist at the accounting firm of Townsend and Townsend, LLP. One of the audit partners, Harold Mobley, asked you to evaluate the effectiveness of general and application IT-related controls for a pote

> St. James Clothiers is a high-end clothing store located in a small Tennessee town. St. James has only one store, which is located in the shopping district by the town square. St. James enjoys the reputation of being the place to buy nice clothing in the

> An entrepreneur by the name of Francisco Fernandez recently entered into a new venture involving ownership and operation of a small, 26-room motel and café. The motel is located in a remote area of southern Utah. The area is popular for tourists, who com

> Apple Inc. (Apple) is a worldwide provider of innovative technology products and services. Apple’s products and services include iPhone®, iPad®, Mac®, iPod®, Apple Watch®, Apple TV®, a portfolio of consumer and professional software applications, iOS, ma

> Tina is an audit manager with a national public accounting firm and one of her clients is Simply Steam, Co. Simply Steam provides industrial and domestic carpet steam-cleaning services. This is the first time Simply Steam has been audited. Thus, Tina doe

> John C. Koss started his first company, J.C. Koss Hospital Television Rental Company, in 1953, based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, but John had greater ambitions. Eventually he partnered with Martin Lange, an engineer, and by 1958 the two had founded Koss Ele

> In December 1995, the flamboyant entrepreneur, Michael “Mickey” Monus, formerly president and chief operating officer (COO) of the deep-discount retail chain Phar-Mor, Inc., was sentenced to 19 years and seven months in prison. Monus was convicted for th

> Xerox Corporation (Xerox), once a star in the technology sector of the economy, found itself engulfed in an accounting scandal alleging that it was too aggressive in recognizing equipment revenue.1 The complaint filed by the Securities and Exchange Commi

> Waste Management, Inc.’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 28, 1997 described the company at that time as a leading international provider of waste management services. According to disclosures i

> One can only imagine the high expectations of investors when the boards of directors of CUC International, Inc. (CUC) and HFS, Inc. (HFS) agreed to merge in May 1997 to form Cendant Corporation. The $14 billion stock merger of HFS and CUC, considered a m

> Enron Corporation entered 2001 as the seventh largest public company in the United States, only to later exit the year as the largest company to ever declare bankruptcy to that point in U.S. history. Investors who lost millions and lawmakers seeking to p

> Don’t ever tell yourself, “that won’t happen to me.” Just ask Cynthia Cooper, former Vice President of Internal Audit at WorldCom. Cynthia Cooper was a typical accounting student as an undergrad at Mississippi State University. Raised in Clinton, Mississ

> The accounting firm of Barnes and Fischer, LLP, is a medium-sized, national CPA firm. The partnership, formed in 1954, now has over 4,000 professionals on the payroll. The firm mainly provides auditing and tax services, but it has recently had success bu

> In what ways can leaders create ethical organizations?

> How do the contemporary theories of leadership relate to earlier foundational theories?

> What are the contingency theories of leadership?

> What are the causes and consequences of abuse of power?

> What power or influence tactics and their contingencies are identified most often?

> How is leadership different from power?

> The authors who suggested that membership in a team makes us smarter found that teams were more rational and quicker at finding solutions to difficult probability problems and reasoning tasks than were individuals. After participation in the study, team

> On the highly functioning teams in which you’ve been a member, what other characteristics might have contributed to success?

> From your experiences in teams, do you agree with the researchers’ findings on the characteristics of smart teams? Why or why not?

> Imagine you are a manager at a national corporation. You have been asked to select employees for a virtual problem-solving team. What types of employees would you include and why?

> Can you think of strategies that can help build trust among virtual team members?

> Recall a time when you felt like you could not trust members on your team. Why did you feel that way? How did that affect the team’s performance?

> What are the relevant points of intellectual and physical abilities to organizational behavior?

> In the cases discussed above, where do you think you would perform better, and why? Justify your answer by taking into account efficiency factors, reward systems, the context, and your individual perceptions.

> What type of group or team are cyclists working for a supervisor for Deliveroo? Justify your answer.

> How should the criterion of “legitimacy” be determined? Explain.

> Is there ever a case in which illegitimate tasks should be tolerated or “rightfully” given? Explain your answer.

> When is work performed by individuals preferred over work performed by teams?

2.99

See Answer